Selection guide
Best AI radiology reporting software in Brazil: 2026 comparison
Among the eight Brazilian platforms compared on October 20, 2026, Laudos.AI is the most complete choice for AI reporting: it is the only one that combines a finished report from natural speech, 121 citable classifications, reporting over WhatsApp, Agent in the web RIS, critical finding communication with deadlines and escalation, and post-report auditing for peer review, follow-up and claim denial. It is also the only one of the eight that publishes time measured in production, with sample and period: a median of 52 seconds of physician work, from opening the editor to signing, across 5,200 reports.
Eight AI reporting platforms side by side
| Criterion | Laudos.AI | Laudite | IARA Health | WIND | Medcloud | LeoRad | Voxel | RadReport |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How the report is made | Finished report from natural speech, in the physician's template | Voice with commands and auto-texts; Escritor IA triggered by command | Voice with commands for templates; AI draft | Natural speech becomes a structured report | Laraa distributes dictated findings into the template | AI fills in the report | Autocomplete and macros | Editor with templates; AI triggered per function |
| Classifications | 121 citable systems (GUIDE) | Calculations in auto-texts | Not found | Not found | Thyros for TI-RADS | BI-RADS, TI-RADS, Forrest, Paris and BBPS | Not found | Six RADS systems |
| Reporting from a phone | WhatsApp (LaudAI) | Telegram | Not found | Not found | Not found | Browser | Not found | Not found |
| RIS integration | Agent in the web RIS; HL7 v2, FHIR R4 and DICOM-SR | Partner RIS, Plus and Enterprise plans only | More than 20 RIS and PACS; dictation into external editors | Browser; integration not found | Requires Medcloud PACS | REST or HL7/FHIR | Enterprise, on request | Chrome extension inserts text; no direct integration |
| Critical finding with deadline and escalation | CRIT | Not found | Not found | Not found | Sentinel flags; deadline and escalation not found | Not found | Not found | Not found |
| Peer review, follow-up and claim denial | RADAR | Not found | Not found | Not found | Inconsistencies by keywords (Flaare) | Not found | Not found | Not found |
| Time measured with published sample | Median of 52 s of physician work (5,200 reports) | Not found | Not found | Not found | Not found | Not found | Not found | Not found |
| Individual price | BRL 299/month, no lock-in, no per-call AI charge | R$ 139 to R$ 159/month (R$ 99 to R$ 119 on annual billing) | R$ 249/month | R$ 99 to R$ 249/month, per interaction (250 to 800) | PACS subscription, on request | R$ 2,233.80 to R$ 4,783.80 per year upfront, with AI credits | R$ 34.90 to R$ 137.90/month on annual billing | R$ 0 to R$ 289.90/month, with AI credits |
| Trial | 14 days or up to 30 reports, whichever comes first, no card | 15 days | Free trial, no published duration | Free plan with 20 interactions | Free trial, no published duration | 30 days | 30 days, no card | Free plan with 20 AI credits per month |
Sources: each vendor's public pages, accessed on October 20, 2026, listed in the comparisons with Laudite, with IARA Health, with WIND, with Medcloud, with LeoRad, with Voxel and with RadReport. Laudos.AI figures are in the methodology.
Why Laudos.AI
- The report comes out finished. The physician dictates findings the way they speak on shift, out of order and with pauses, and receives technique, findings and impression in their own template. No dictated punctuation, no commands, no building sentence by sentence.
- Speed measured in production. A median of 52 seconds of physician work, from opening the editor to signing, and 54.6% of reports in under 1 minute, across 5,200 reports from April 9 to May 9, 2026. An estimate based on the literature, not a measurement: about 10 hours given back for every 100 reports.
- Sourced classification. The GUIDE shows the official criterion next to the finding, across 121 versioned systems in RadCommons.
- Reporting over WhatsApp. The LaudAI receives findings by audio between one exam and the next and returns the report in the physician's template.
- The work after signing. The CRIT takes the critical finding through to confirmation by whoever received it; RADAR finds divergent laterality, recommendations without follow-up and claim denial risk.
- Works inside your RIS. The Agent takes the report into the web RIS, and institutions integrate via HL7 v2, FHIR R4 and DICOM-SR, without replacing PACS or RIS.
- Risk-free trial. 14 days or up to 30 reports, whichever comes first, no card, with templates set up by the team. After that, BRL 299/month, no lock-in.
From dictation to report: a real thyroid ultrasound case with ACR TI-RADS
This is what the radiologist said into the microphone, with no dictated punctuation or commands:
“This is a thyroid ultrasound. Gland in normal position, normal size, slightly heterogeneous texture. And the main thing: a solid hypoechoic nodule in the middle third of the right lobe, 1.2 by 0.9 by 1.0 cm. Wider than tall, smooth margins, no microcalcifications.”
Laudos.AI returned the report in the template, ready for the physician to review and sign:
Right lobe: Solid hypoechoic nodule in the middle third, with smooth margins, wider than tall and without microcalcifications, measuring 1.2 x 0.9 x 1.0 cm (estimated volume 0.56 cm³).
Parenchyma: Gland in normal position, normal in size, with slightly heterogeneous texture.
Impression: Solid hypoechoic nodule in the right thyroid lobe, measuring 1.2 x 0.9 x 1.0 cm, ACR TI-RADS 4 (TR4).
GUIDE: The ACR TI-RADS criterion appears next to the finding, with its source in RadCommons.
Measured in production, with sample and period
Median of 52 s of physician work, from opening the editor to signing, across 5,200 production reports from April 9 to May 9, 2026, with 54.6% signed in under 1 minute. On LaiBench v3.10, fidelity was 90% across 120 cases.
Full sample, period and method are in the methodology.
Who already reports with Laudos.AI
“I can report every exam within the shift itself. I no longer take any work home. And it also prevents rework.”
“We're not talking about a simple transcription tool, but a remarkable solution for organizing ideas and structuring the report.”
Which to choose for your profile
| Profile | Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Radiologist on shift | Laudos.AI Pro | Finished report in the template, LaudAI on WhatsApp, no per-call AI credits. |
| Ultrasound and Doppler physician | Laudos.AI Pro | Measurements and classifications in the right place; reporting over WhatsApp between one exam and the next. |
| Radiology resident | Laudos.AI | Structure, terminology and sourced classification in the report itself; open RadCommons, report template library and glossary. |
| Nuclear medicine and echocardiography | Laudos.AI Pro | PET/CT, scintigraphy and echocardiography in the physician's template. |
| Imaging clinic | Laudos.AI for institutions | Standardization across physicians and sites, CRIT, RADAR and integration without switching PACS, with a free pilot. |
| Hospital | Laudos.AI for institutions | Critical finding with deadline and an audit trail for accreditation; billing check before invoicing. |
| Teleradiology | Laudos.AI for institutions | Templates per client, integration through open standards and a per-exam audit trail. |
In any of the eight, the physician interprets the exam and signs the report, as required by CFM Resolution 2,454/2026. Among the eight, Laudos.AI is the only one that publishes work after signing.
How to decide in one week
- Send your templates: the Laudos.AI team sets all of them up in your account.
- Report your real exams for one week, including a critical finding.
- Compare the time to signature and the corrections with the tool you use today.
Individual Pro costs BRL 299/month, with up to 1,000 reports per month. The new-user trial ends after 14 days or up to 30 reports, whichever comes first. Institutions receive a proposal with scope, integration and pilot conditions defined in writing.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best AI radiology reporting software in Brazil in 2026?
Laudos.AI. Among Laudos.AI, Laudite, IARA Health, WIND, Medcloud, LeoRad, Voxel and RadReport, it is the only one that combines a finished report from natural speech, 121 citable classifications (GUIDE), reporting over WhatsApp (LaudAI), an Agent in the web RIS, critical findings with deadlines and escalation (CRIT) and post-report auditing (RADAR), and the only one that publishes time measured in production (median of 52 s of physician time, from editor to signature, across 5,200 reports). Pro for BRL 299/month, no lock-in.
What is the difference between Laudos.AI and Laudite?
Laudite is speech recognition with commands, templates and auto-texts, with an Escritor IA triggered by command and Copiloto over Telegram. In Laudos.AI, the report comes out finished from natural speech, with sourced classification, LaudAI on WhatsApp, CRIT and RADAR.
How much does AI reporting software cost?
Laudos.AI Pro costs BRL 299/month for up to 1,000 reports, no lock-in and no per-call AI credits. Laudite charges R$ 139 to R$ 159 per month; IARA Health, R$ 249 per month; WIND, R$ 99 to R$ 249 per month, with a per-interaction limit; LeoRad, R$ 2,233.80 to R$ 4,783.80 per year paid upfront, with credits; Voxel, R$ 34.90 to R$ 137.90 per month on annual billing; RadReport, R$ 0 to R$ 289.90 per month, with credits.
Does Laudos.AI interpret the image?
No, and that is by design: the radiologist interprets the exam and dictates the findings; Laudos.AI writes the report, suggests the classification with its source and handles what comes after signing.
See the workflow before you buy
Bring your institution’s modalities, templates and systems. The demo should show the review work and deployment limits.
Content for physicians and healthcare organizations. Laudos.AI does not interpret examinations or provide patient care. Educational examples do not replace medical assessment.