The house standard,
applied under review
LaudAI structures the draft by modality according to the institution's configuration and templates. The institution governs the standard; the physician reviews, edits, validates and signs.
What LaudAI delivers
- TEMPLATES
The institution's model
Templates by modality and by exam, with the house sections, order and style. No generic vendor report.
- CT · MRI · US · X-RAY · MAMMO — VERSIONEDGOVERNANCE
Versioned and auditable
Each template has an owner, a version and an approval trail: who changed it, what changed and when. The standard evolves under control, not by email.
- TERMINOLOGY
Radiological Portuguese
Technical vocabulary in Portuguese, consistent across reports and across radiologists on the same team. The house report sounds like the house.
The institutional standard shows up without straitjacketing the case.
LaudAI is a layer of the clinical workflow, connected to the exam context, to physician review and to what happens after signature.
Human supervision,
by architecture.
The institution controls models, versions and approvals. LaudAI applies that clinical asset; it does not invent a parallel standard.
Less operation.
More image.
A template in a PDF depends on heroic discipline. A governed template comes in on its own, follows the current version and survives the shift change.
“A governed template reduces structural variation without taking the decision on the specific case away from the physician.”
Standardization that survives the shift
Every department has the ideal template in some PDF, and reality in the Friday-night reports. The difference between the two is governance: without versioning, approval and automatic application, the standard lasts until the next team change.
With LaudAI, the right template comes in on its own based on the exam type. The radiologist dictates the way they think, and the house structure holds, report after report. For the manager, this means comparable, auditable reports that carry the institution's identity.
The clinical evidence points the same way: structured reporting improves completeness and communication with whoever ordered the exam. What usually holds back the migration is friction in the routine, exactly what automatic application eliminates.
Specification
- COVERAGETemplates by modality: CT, MRI, US, X-ray, mammography and more
- SELECTIONTemplate applied automatically by exam type
- CONTROLVersioning, approval and change trail
- CONSISTENCYStandardized terminology across teams
- AUTHORSHIPThe radiologist reviews, edits and signs. Always.
Direct questions
Who creates and maintains the templates?
The institution. Deployment starts from the models the institution already uses; the Laudos.AI clinical team helps structure them, and from then on the governance is yours, with versioning and approval.
What about exams that don't fit the template?
The template is a starting point, not a straitjacket. The radiologist adapts whatever the case calls for, and the change is recorded in the exam log.
Can we migrate gradually?
Yes, by modality or by department. It is the recommended route: start where volume concentrates the gain and expand once the team is comfortable.
Standardization that survives the shift change
Every institution has the ideal template in some document and the reality of Friday-night reports. The gap between the two is governance: without an owner, a version and automatic application, the standard lasts until the next team change. In LaudAI, each template has a clinical owner, a change history and an approval workflow, and comes in on its own based on the exam type.
The radiologist does not fill out a form: they dictate over the structure, which has already arrived assembled. The complex case grows where it needs to, the adaptation is recorded in the log, and the house standard no longer depends on heroic discipline.
Governance that continues after go-live
From the folder of models to the governed template
Migration starts with the documents the institution already uses. Each model is broken down into sections, required fields, terminology and exceptions by exam type. The clinical owner validates the first version before the pilot; the team does not receive a generic vendor template, nor does it need to abandon its own language to get started.
Once published, the template has an owner and a history. A change can be prepared as a draft, reviewed by clinical leadership and promoted to the current version without erasing what was used in earlier reports. If the new version does not work as expected, operations go back to the previous one while the adjustment is fixed.
Standardizing the form does not standardize judgment
The template governs presence, order and terminology; it does not decide the clinical content. An atypical case can grow beyond the structure, and the radiologist remains free to edit the text before signing. The institutional gain lies in removing accidental variation in format while preserving authorship and the clinically necessary exception.
The template doesn't get lost in the rush.
House template by modality, Portuguese terminology, versioning and governance. When the queue tightens, the field stays in the agreed place and every template change has a date, a version and an owner.
See your institution's template applied
Live demo with your exam types and your institution's template, right in the product.