HL7 v2
Order, status and result moving between clinical systems with traceability.
See HL7 →RESOURCES · INTEGRATIONS
The report goes back to
your system
Worklist, indication and priors come in with no manual upload. The signed report returns to the RIS and the PACS. The radiologist doesn't switch screens.
IN DETAIL
What connects
- PACS
Images and priors
The current exam and prior ones available in the report context, without hunting for an old study in another window.
PACS integration → - RIS
Worklist and indication
The queue, the clinical indication and the order data imported directly, with no retyping and no PDF attached to an email.
RIS integration → - RETURN
Signed report sent back
Signed, sent back: the report enters the institution's delivery flow automatically, in the format your system expects.
Explore DICOM-SR →
OVERVIEW
Standards and integration points
See how each standard takes part in the flow between order, image, worklist, report and delivery.
PACS
Exam context and priors connected to the report flow.
See PACS →RIS
Scheduling, worklist, indication, signature and delivery in the radiology system.
See RIS →DICOM-SR
The structured report returning as a DICOM object, with fields and context preserved.
See DICOM-SR →Worklist
The right exam reaching the radiologist with the order data, with no manual typing.
See Worklist →API
Authentication, endpoints and dedicated integrations for institutional workflows.
See API →THE FIT
Six pieces, one single path
Each standard covers one stretch of the route between order and delivery. What the deployment designs is how they fit together.
From exam to your system, without switching screens
Exams come in, Laudos.AI structures, the signed report goes back. Hover over the animation.
EXAMSLAUDOS.AIYOUR SYSTEM
How integration happens
Our team leads the design together with your in-house IT, during the deployment phase. We map worklist, indication, priors and the report's return path. We define the standards: HL7, DICOM or a dedicated integration for your RIS/PACS. We test with real exams before switching on the routine.
The platform segregates credentials by institution, encrypts traffic and logs every message exchanged. The integration also feeds the manager dashboard: TAT, queues and critical-finding SLA in real time.
Technical specs
- STANDARDSHL7, DICOM and dedicated integrations per RIS/PACS
- INPUTWorklist, clinical indication, order data and priors
- OUTPUTSigned report returned to the institution's RIS/PACS
- SECURITYCredentials segregated by institution
- DEPLOYMENTLed by our team together with the in-house IT team
- MONITORINGFlow integrated into the manager's dashboard and the status page
FAQ
Direct questions
My RIS is old and doesn't speak HL7 properly. Now what?
It happens more often than you'd think. Dedicated integration covers many of these cases; the technical assessment during deployment maps what exists and proposes the path before any commitment.
Will the integration bring my operation down during the cutover?
It shouldn't. The standard is to run in parallel during the pilot, validate with real exams and only then cut off the old flow, in a window agreed with IT.
Who maintains the integration afterward?
Laudos.AI monitors the flow and the status page communicates incidents. Changes on the institution's RIS/PACS side are handled as maintenance coordinated with IT.
What to validate before production
The technical map starts at the event, not at the system's name
Saying that an environment uses HL7, DICOM, RIS or PACS does not yet define an integration. The assessment identifies five points: how the order originates, which fields reach the worklist and where the indication and priors sit. The other two are how the signature changes the status and in what format the result returns. Both teams validate version, message, required field, acknowledgment and error behavior in the institution's real scenario.
The demo can illustrate the flow; acceptance testing proves yours. It uses test exams, reconciles what went in with what came back and checks for duplicates, delays and delivery failures. Only after this sequence does the team decide whether the path is ready for routine use or needs to stay in parallel.
Operation and maintenance are part of the connection
Integration does not end with the first result received. A field change in the RIS, an interface update, an expired credential and an interrupted queue need monitoring, an owner and an escalation path. The scope defines what Laudos.AI monitors and what the in-house IT team monitors. It also defines how both teams reconcile an exam that did not complete the cycle.
NEXT STEP
Tell us your RIS and PACS in the demo
The integration conversation starts on the first call, not after the contract.
Questions and answers
How many items are in this integrations section?
There are 6 pages published in this section, and each one opens directly, with no sign-up and no paywall. All sections
What is this integrations section for?
To describe how the platform communicates with PACS, RIS and the medical record, using industry standards. Who publishes
Is the content reviewed by a physician?
Yes. Editorial responsibility lies with a radiologist registered with CRM-SP, and each page shows the date the content last changed. Who signs
Does this replace clinical assessment?
No. The material supports the decision of whoever writes the report. The finding, the clinical correlation and the management remain with whoever signs the exam. Clinical governance