32 checklists sistemáticos para informes radiológicos por modalidad y región anatómica.
Checklist sistemático para laudo de TC de tórax com avaliação completa de parênquima pulmonar, vias aéreas, mediastino, pleura e parede torácica.
Checklist sistemático para laudo de RM de encéfalo, incluindo avaliação multiplanar e multisequencial de todas as estruturas intracranianas.
Checklist sistemático para laudo de radiografia de tórax, o exame radiológico mais realizado no mundo.
Checklist sistemático para laudo de ultrassonografia de abdome total, abrangendo todos os órgãos abdominais.
Checklist sistemático para laudo de mamografia bilateral seguindo as recomendações do ACR BI-RADS 5ª edição, incluindo composição mamária, achados e classificação.
Practical use
How to evaluate this topic in reporting routine
Checklists de Informes Radiológicos should connect to the real workflow: image review, findings, structured report, signature, and delivery. Useful content helps decide whether the workflow safely reduces rework.
Clinical fit
The page should help a radiologist decide what changes in the report, not just what a tool claims.
- Related reporting standards and modalities: RM.
- Protect clinically relevant negatives.
- Keep room for unexpected findings.
Review discipline
Physician review must remain visible: findings, measurements, laterality, comparison, and impression before signature.
- Check measurements, side, anatomical segment, and comparison.
- Avoid impressions not supported by findings.
- Standardize without erasing physician style.
Product validation
The best validation is a narrow pilot with one frequent exam, one real template, and measured corrections.
- Use routine cases, not polished demo cases.
- Measure time-to-review and correction burden.
- Scale only after normal and abnormal cases are consistent.
Adoption criteria
What separates useful workflow from generic text
The workflow accepts natural speech and typed findings without forcing dictated formatting.
The output preserves clinical sections and makes physician review easier before signature.
The result can return to the service workflow without becoming an island outside PACS/RIS.
The team can audit edits, permissions, and critical-result communication.
Current workflow
Natural voice
Radiologists speak findings naturally while the platform handles structure, punctuation, and review.
Structured reports
Templates and fields preserve modality standards without blocking physician edits before signature.
Governance
Real adoption depends on access control, auditability, privacy, integrations, and operational traceability.
FAQ
Does Laudos.AI replace physician review?
No. The radiologist keeps control over interpretation, review, and report signature.
What is the safest next step?
Test one frequent exam with a real template and full physician review before expanding.